GTFS Schedule Validation Report

This report was generated by the Canonical GTFS Schedule validator, version 7.1.0 at 2025-12-05T14:14:09Z,
for the dataset file:///shared/cottonwood.zip. No country code was provided.

Use this report alongside our documentation.

Summary

Agencies included

Feed Info

Publisher Name:
Busmaps.com
Publisher URL:
https://busmaps.com
Feed Email:
alex@busmaps.com
Feed Language:
English
Feed Start Date:
2023-05-02
Feed End Date:
2026-12-31

Files included

  1. agency.txt
  2. calendar.txt
  3. fare_attributes.txt
  4. fare_rules.txt
  5. feed_info.txt
  6. routes.txt
  7. shapes.txt
  8. stop_times.txt
  9. stops.txt
  10. trips.txt

Counts

  • Agencies: 1
  • Blocks: 12
  • Routes: 5
  • Shapes: 5
  • Stops: 121
  • Trips: 64

Specification Compliance report

4 notices reported (0 errors, 4 warnings, 0 infos)

Notice Code Severity Total
route_long_name_contains_short_name WARNING 4

route_long_name_contains_short_name

Long name should not contain short name for a single route.

In routes.txt, route_long_name should not contain the value for route_short_name, because when both are provided, they are often combined by transit applications. Note that only one of the two fields is required. If there is no short name used for a route, use route_long_name only.

Good examples:

route_short_name/route_long_name Dataset
"N"/"Judah" Muni San Fransisco
"6"/"ML King Jr Blvd" Trimet Portland Streetcar
"55"/"Boulevard Saint Laurent" STM Montreal
"1"/"Rangiora/Cashmere" Metro Christchurch

Bad examples:

route_short_name/route_long_name
"604"/"604"
"14"/"Route 14"
"2"/"Route 2: Bellows Falls In-Town"

You can see more about this notice here.

routeId (?) The id of the faulty record. csvRowNumber (?) The row number of the faulty record. routeShortName (?) The faulty record's `route_short_name`. routeLongName (?) The faulty record's `route_long_name`.
"195-719" 2 "Blue" "Blue Line"
"195-720" 3 "Red" "Red Line"
"195-1148" 4 "Yellow" "Yellow Line"
"195-1149" 5 "Green" "Green Line"