route_long_name_contains_short_name
Long name should not contain short name for a single route.
In routes.txt, route_long_name should not contain the value for route_short_name,
because when both are provided, they are often combined by transit applications. Note that only
one of the two fields is required. If there is no short name used for a route, use
route_long_name only.
Good examples:
Bad examples:
| route_short_name/route_long_name |
| "604"/"604" |
| "14"/"Route 14" |
| "2"/"Route 2: Bellows Falls In-Town" |
You can see more about this notice here.
|
routeId
(?)
The id of the faulty record.
|
csvRowNumber
(?)
The row number of the faulty record.
|
routeShortName
(?)
The faulty record's `route_short_name`.
|
routeLongName
(?)
The faulty record's `route_long_name`.
|
| "102895-1-20" |
2 |
"1" |
"1 - Forum / Cap-Sud" |
| "102895-1D-20" |
3 |
"1d" |
"1D - Ligne 1D - Forum / Cap-Sud" |
| "102895-2-20" |
4 |
"2" |
"2 - Ligne 2 - Grands Chênes / Brassioux" |
| "102895-2D-20" |
5 |
"2d" |
"2D - Ligne 2D - Touvent / Vaugirard" |
| "102895-3-20" |
6 |
"3" |
"3 - Ligne 3 - Craquelin / Vaugirard" |
| "102895-4-20" |
7 |
"4" |
"4 - Ligne 4 - Brande / Cécile Sorel" |
| "102895-5-20" |
8 |
"5" |
"5 - Ligne 5 - Voltaire / Sassierges-St-Germain" |
| "102895-6-20" |
9 |
"6" |
"6 - Ligne 6 - Sablons / Céré" |
| "102895-7-20" |
10 |
"7" |
"7 - Ligne 7 - Silos / Lycée Agricole" |
| "102895-8-20" |
11 |
"8" |
"8 - Ligne 8 - Voltaire / Montierchaume" |
| "102895-9-20" |
12 |
"9" |
"9 - Ligne 9 - Voltaire / Ardentes" |
| "102895-10-20" |
13 |
"10" |
"10 - Ligne 10 - Giraudoux / Arthon" |
| "102895-11-20" |
14 |
"11" |
"11 - Ligne 11 - Voltaire / Luant" |
| "102895-12-20" |
15 |
"12" |
"12 - Ligne 12 - Voltaire / Villers-Les-Ormes" |